What was the court's decision regarding Miller's suit for disability discrimination?

The court's decision to dismiss Miller's suit for disability discrimination due to the arbitration agreement underscores the legal principle that parties can agree to resolve disputes outside of the traditional court system. Arbitration agreements are often found in employment contracts and can preclude individuals from pursuing claims in court. In this case, the existence of a binding arbitration agreement indicated that both parties had previously consented to arbitration as a method for resolving disputes, including claims of discrimination.

Such agreements are generally designed to streamline dispute resolution and can prevent litigation in court if they are deemed enforceable under the law. The decision emphasizes the importance of these contractual arrangements and serves to highlight the judicial support for arbitration as a legitimate alternative to judicial proceedings.

Other options such as allowing the suit to proceed, settling out of court, or postponing the suit do not align with the reality that a valid arbitration agreement was in place, which necessitated the dismissal of the lawsuit in favor of arbitration.